|
J.P. Euzéby: List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature - Genus Silicibacter |
|
|
Warning: In the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature, an arrow (--->) only indicates the sequence of valid publication of names and does not mean that the last name in the sequence must be used (see: Introduction).
Number of species cited in this file: 2
Classification (Warning: see also the file "Classification of prokaryotes: Introduction").
Silicibacter Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999, gen. nov.
---> ¤ Ruegeria Uchino et al. 1999.
Note: Yi et al. 2007 propose to transfer ¤ Silicibacter lacuscaerulensis Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999 (the type species of the genus Silicibacter) to the genus ¤ Ruegeria as ¤ Ruegeria lacuscaerulensis (Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999) Yi et al. 2007, comb. nov. According to Rule 37a, bacteriologists adhering to this proposal must change the name Silicibacter to ¤ Ruegeria.
---> Silicibacter Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999.
Note: According to Muramatsu et al. 2007, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis suggests that the genera ¤ Ruegeria and Silicibacter are closely related and should be integrated into one genus (i.e. ¤ Ruegeria Uchino et al. 1999 which has priority over Silicibacter Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999). However, their differential phenotypic properties do not support this unification. Consequently the authors retain the two species of Silicibacter in their paper.
Silicibacter lacuscaerulensis Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999, sp. nov. (Type species of the genus).
---> ¤ Ruegeria lacuscaerulensis (Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999) Yi et al. 2007, comb. nov. ---> Silicibacter lacuscaerulensis Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999.
Note: According to Muramatsu et al. 2007, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis suggests that the genera ¤ Ruegeria and Silicibacter are closely related and should be integrated into one genus (i.e. ¤ Ruegeria Uchino et al. 1999 which has priority over Silicibacter Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999). However, their differential phenotypic properties do not support this unification. Consequently the authors retain the two species of Silicibacter in their paper.
Silicibacter pomeroyi González et al. 2003, sp. nov.
---> ¤ Ruegeria pomeroyi (González et al. 2003) Yi et al. 2007, comb. nov. ---> Silicibacter pomeroyi González et al. 2003.
Note: According to Muramatsu et al. 2007, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis suggests that the genera ¤ Ruegeria and Silicibacter are closely related and should be integrated into one genus (i.e. ¤ Ruegeria Uchino et al. 1999 which has priority over Silicibacter Petursdottir and Kristjansson 1999). However, their differential phenotypic properties do not support this unification. Consequently the authors retain the two species of Silicibacter in their paper.
Copyright © J.P. Euzéby
|
|